British Prime Minister David Cameron today condemned Facebook as
'irresponsible' after lifting a ban on gruesome videos of people being beheaded
by Jihadists.
|
The Prime Minister said the social network was wrong to secretly
change its policy and must justify its actions to parents and users of the
site.
The U.S. firm had banned footage of decapitation on its site in
May citing concerns that it would cause long-term psychological damage.
But Facebook, which is open to anyone over the age of 13, now
claims its users should be able to watch as long as they condemn these videos,
not celebrate them.
Writing on Twitter, Mr Cameron said: 'It's irresponsible of Facebook
to post beheading videos, especially without a warning.
'They must explain their actions to worried parents.'
Suicide prevention charities also condemned the decision saying
the material is 'psychologically destructive'.
'It only takes seconds of exposure to such graphic material to
leave a permanent trace - particularly in a young person's mind,' Dr Arthur
Cassidy, who runs the Yellow Ribbon Program in Northern Ireland, said
today.
'The more graphic and colourful the material is, the more
psychologically destructive it becomes.'
The change in policy was brought in quietly and only discovered by
a user who said Facebook was refusing to remove a page showing a clip of a
masked man killing a woman.
‘This is absolutely horrible, distasteful and needs to be
removed... there are too many young minds that can see this. I'm 23 and I'm
very disturbed after seeing a couple of seconds of it,’ wrote one user.
Despite now allowing decapitation footage, the social network’s
terms and conditions say it will continue to remove banned material including
an exposed woman’s breasts.
‘Photos that show a fully exposed breast where the child is not
actively engaged in nursing do violate the Facebook Terms,’ the site said.
But the social network has come under repeated fire from mothers
whose pictures showing children breast-feeding are deleted and their accounts
closed.
Last year, the group banned a picture of a woman reclining in her
bath tub with the only nudity visible being her shoulder and her elbow,
although the pose appeared to be inappropriate.
The snap was uploaded by web magazine Theories of the Deep
Understanding of Things to test how the social network's terms of service deal
with pictures that are misleading.
It posed the question of whether the photo-sharing website content
policies are based on indecency or the mere appearance of indecency.
'Since some people object to graphic video of this nature, we are
working to give people additional control over the content they see,' said a spokesperson
for Facebook.
'This may include warning them in advance that the image they are
about to see contains graphic content.'
No comments:
Post a Comment